首页> 外文OA文献 >Associations between problems with crying, sleeping and/or feeding in infancy and long-term behavioural outcomes in childhood : a meta-analysis
【2h】

Associations between problems with crying, sleeping and/or feeding in infancy and long-term behavioural outcomes in childhood : a meta-analysis

机译:婴儿哭闹,睡眠和/或进食问题与儿童长期行为结局之间的关联:一项荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Excessive crying, sleeping or feeding problems are found in approximately 20% of infants and may predict behavioural problems in childhood. \ud\udMethods A quantitative meta-analysis of 22 longitudinal studies from 1987 to 2006 that statistically tested the association between infant regulatory problems and childhood internalising, externalising and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) problems was carried out; 1935 children with regulatory problems were tested. Cohen's d was used to express the association between regulatory problems and behavioural problems. Heterogeneity of the effect sizes was assessed using the I 2 statistic and meta-analysis of variance and meta-regressions were conducted to assess the influence of moderators. Rosenthal's classic fail-safe N and correlation of sample sizes to effect sizes were used to assess publication bias. \ud\udResults The weighted mean effect size for the main regulatory problems-behavioural problems association was 0.41 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.54), indicating that children with previous regulatory problems have more behavioural problems than controls. Externalising and ADHD problems were the strongest outcome of any regulatory problem, indicated by the highest fail-safe N and lowest correlation of sample size to effect size. Meta-analyses of variance revealed no significant moderating influences of regulatory problem comorbidity (I(2) = 44.0, p > 0.05), type (I(2) = 41.8, p > 0.05) or duration (I(2) = 44.0, p > 0.05). However, cumulative problems and clinical referral increased the risk of behavioural problems. \ud\udConclusions The meta-analyses suggest that children with previous regulatory problems have more behavioural problems than controls, particularly in multi-problem families. Further studies are required to assess the behavioural outcomes of previously sleep, feeding or multiply disturbed children.
机译:背景技术大约20%的婴儿发现过度的哭闹,睡眠或喂养问题,并且可能预示着儿童时期的行为问题。方法1987年至2006年对22项纵向研究进行了定量荟萃分析,以统计学方式检验了婴儿调节问题与儿童内在化,外在化和注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)问题之间的关系; 1935年有监管问题的儿童接受了测试。 Cohen的d用于表达监管问题和行为问题之间的关联。使用I 2统计量评估效应量的异质性,并进行方差和荟萃分析的荟萃分析,以评估主持人的影响。 Rosenthal的经典故障保险N和样本大小与影响大小的相关性用于评估发布偏差。 \ ud \ udResults主要监管问题(行为问题关联)的加权平均效应大小为0.41(95%CI为0.28至0.54),表明先前有监管问题的儿童比对照组的行为问题更多。外部化和ADHD问题是任何监管问题的最强结果,这由故障安全系数N最高和样本量与效应量之间的最低相关性表明。方差的荟萃分析显示,监管问题合并症(I(2)= 44.0,p> 0.05),类型(I(2)= 41.8,p> 0.05)或持续时间(I(2)= 44.0, p> 0.05)。但是,累积问题和临床转诊增加了行为问题的风险。结论:荟萃分析表明,以前有管理问题的孩子比对照组有更多的行为问题,尤其是在有多个问题的家庭中。需要做进一步的研究来评估以前的睡眠,进食或多重困扰儿童的行为结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号